Usage with a SPA about cerebral HOT 2 CLOSED

Hi @formula349 ,

Thanks for great input!

I can say that it is currently out of scope and I think we need a bit more experience before deciding something.

What I can say for now is that it does add complexity. There is no longer a single point to define and use signals, you have to know at what path that signal is related to. I think it also would be more difficult to refactor such a signal.

Maybe it is a better idea to have multiple cerebral instances? So if each site actually does not have anything to do with the other you could consider it "a different person". So you have two different top components where you inject two different cerebrals. Would that make sense?

from cerebral.

reading this issue again I think it breaks the architecture. Signals has no knowledge of state and that is important, they only request state changes. Though I do think we will meet issues with structuring larger applications, but I think we should wait to solve that until we have some more examples.

So I am all for some sort of dividing signals and possibly an entrypath to state changes, but not base signals on a specific state. Again, let me know if you get into trouble and we can bring up a discussion on it :-)

from cerebral.