2020-10-28: Using existing definitions about glosario HOT 4 OPEN

We could easily add a sources key with links and names. Should this be at the entry level or at the language level, i.e., would it be:

- slug: despondency
  sources:
  - name: "Wikipedia article on programming"
    url: http://something-or-other
  en:
    term: "depondency"
    def: "..."
  es:
    term: abatimiento
    def: "..."

or:

- slug: despondency
  en:
    term: "depondency"
    sources:
    - name: "Wikipedia article on programming"
      url: http://something-or-other
    def: "..."
  es:
    term: "abatimiento"
    # doesn't have external sources (yet)
    def: "..."

from glosario.

We could easily add a sources key with links and names. Should this be at the entry level or at the language level

I would expect that sources would need to be at the language level since I am not likely to find a Polish translation of "Working Directory" in the same place as one in Farsi.

from glosario.

I actually had the same question and was hesitant to add Korean translations because I was unsure of how to credit the source.

@carpentries/glosario-editors, any thoughts?

from glosario.

My immediate thought would be to cite existing definitions in a numbered style (i.e like Wikipedia). Not sure how 'do-able' it is in Github and particularly the repo as it is now.

from glosario.