Only failed test about karma-tap-pretty-reporter HOT 9 CLOSED

Right now this is not implemented on karma-tap-pretty-reporter but I think is more suitable to do on a prettifier package

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

It would be right, if we could use prettifiers in pipe. But we cant :(

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

If you create your custom prettifier I could add to karma-tap-pretty-reporter .

How you say, we cannot pipe on browsers enviroments.

Maybe we can make this at code level, without using standalone tools, just using something like tape
Is ther another tool, don´t tested it myself, subtap

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

You can use https://github.com/namuol/tap-difflet

    tapReporter: {
      // outputFile: './unit.tap',
      get prettify() { return () => require('tap-difflet')({ pessimistic: true }); },
      separator: '****************************',
    },

But you should update this packages to latest versions. And have node version with getters available. I use node 6.0

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

Why getters is needed in this case?

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

You are right, this code can be rewriten more simpler without getters:

    tapReporter: {
      // outputFile: './unit.tap',
      prettify: function() { return require('tap-difflet')({ pessimistic: true }); },
      separator: '****************************',
    },

Maybe this can be added to README

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

update README with Show only failed test use case.

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

closed due inactivity.

Feel free to reopen is needed

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.

Thanks

from karma-tap-pretty-reporter.