Do we still need s2n_ensure_memmove_trace? about s2n-tls HOT 1 OPEN

/home/ubuntu/s2n/tests/unit/s2n_safety_test.c: In function ‘failure_memcpy’:
/home/ubuntu/s2n/./utils/s2n_ensure.h:67:23: warning: ‘src’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   67 |             void *r = s2n_ensure_memmove_trace((d), (s), (__tmp_n)); \
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/ubuntu/s2n/./utils/s2n_safety_macros.h:360:63: note: in expansion of macro ‘__S2N_ENSURE_SAFE_MEMMOVE’
  360 | #define POSIX_CHECKED_MEMCPY(destination, source, len)        __S2N_ENSURE_SAFE_MEMMOVE((destination), (source), (len), POSIX_ENSURE_REF)
      |                                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/ubuntu/s2n/tests/unit/s2n_safety_test.c:134:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘POSIX_CHECKED_MEMCPY’
  134 |     POSIX_CHECKED_MEMCPY(ptr, src, 1024);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/ubuntu/s2n/./utils/s2n_ensure.h:93:7: note: by argument 2 of type ‘const void *’ to ‘s2n_ensure_memmove_trace’ declared here
   93 | void *s2n_ensure_memmove_trace(void *to, const void *from, size_t size);
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/ubuntu/s2n/tests/unit/s2n_safety_test.c:131:10: note: ‘src’ declared here
  131 |     char src[1024];
      |          ^~~