[Feature Request][Bug?] Request-scope LoggingUtils setting of keys about powertools-lambda-java HOT 5 CLOSED

@humanzz Here you go! #453

from powertools-lambda-java.

This is great! Thanks a lot for the quick action @pankajagrawal16

A small question, this should work even if LoggingUtils.appendKeys call is made outside of the handler function, right? As along as it's within the same thread (ThreadContext), right?

Yes it will work either way, since we are clearing the MDC context of log4j

from powertools-lambda-java.

I've had a look at both Java and Python versions documentation

• Java: https://awslabs.github.io/aws-lambda-powertools-java/core/logging.html#appending-additional-keys
• Python: https://awslabs.github.io/aws-lambda-powertools-python/latest/core/logger/#appending-additional-keys

The python version's documentation is clear about the expected behaviour but also provides a way to achieve the behaviour I described as desired https://awslabs.github.io/aws-lambda-powertools-python/latest/core/logger/#clearing-all-state

from powertools-lambda-java.

Thanks for opening the issue and findings. I will bring in feature parity with python version 👍🏼

from powertools-lambda-java.

This is great! Thanks a lot for the quick action @pankajagrawal16

A small question, this should work even if LoggingUtils.appendKeys call is made outside of the handler function, right? As along as it's within the same thread (ThreadContext), right?

from powertools-lambda-java.