Need prefix for functions about bitbucketps HOT 4 CLOSED

Why should they be in conflict?
They are private methods....

also, the module has a prefix: BitBucket (by default. which can be changed with Import-Module BitBucketPS -Prefix BB

from bitbucketps.

Why should they be in conflict? They are private methods....

That are loaded into memory. If I Invoke-Method how does PowerShell know which to use?

also, the module has a prefix: BitBucket

Where? I don't see anything in the manifest

(by default. which can be changed with Import-Module BitBucketPS -Prefix BB

I don't think pushing the responsibility of conflict resolution onto the user is the right answer. Especially when you're talking about a products within the same company. If you conflict with some other random module, oh well you can only control so much. But we can control this and make the experience seamless. Why NOT do it?

from bitbucketps.

Ok, found the prefix. Was looking at the wrong repo (ironically, my own!)

Haven't played with that much. Is the idea to allow you to use the same functions in multiple modules?

from bitbucketps.

That are loaded into memory. If I Invoke-Method how does PowerShell know which to use?

Private methods only exist in the context of the module. so only functions of the module have access to it. it doesn't exist outside the module.

Is the idea to allow you to use the same functions in multiple modules?

No. The idea of the -Prefix is that the default might be too long (or otherwise unwanted) for the user. So he gets the chance to change it to what he prefers; but the verb and the noun (without prefix) are unchanged

from bitbucketps.