Whether the contents of the compiler or function node can be cached in the local file about asmjit HOT 6 CLOSED

If the compiler saves the string assembly and uses asmjit+asmtk to compile and load the string assembly into memory in real time at runtime, this idea can be realized. However, the compilation speed seems to be slow, and some implementations in function nodes cannot be used.

from asmjit.

When using "logger" and asmtk, there is no way to convert the address back to the original string symbol and compile the result generated by the logger

from asmjit.

You can already do this yourself if you are using the Builder, you can just traverse all nodes and save them to disk and when you load the file you just create the nodes again.

from asmjit.

True, the only way is to serialize and deserialize the content yourself. The reason is that I would like to not deal with compatibility of the serialized content (versions, new features, etc...), so this is supposed to be done by users. I think that maybe caching the content of your upper layer that generates the code would be much better / easier than caching the nodes - depends on the number of nodes, but I don't really see a big overhead here - you can create the nodes at a lighting speed, and even if you load them from a file, you have to create them anyway.

BTW logger is not a proper tool for serializing the content - it's purpose is to log something, but not immediately log it in a format that is then parseable by asmtk or other assemblers.

from asmjit.

from asmjit.

In other words, I need to implement a compilation process similar to the generation and parsing of "llvm IR" intermediate bytecode, and input the intermediate code to the asmjit compiler to finally generate the machine code.

Well, I can't think of any more scientific way.

from asmjit.