More configuration options about solr-operator HOT 9 CLOSED

Hey @meskallito thanks for the input. We can definitely look at adding these things, they seem reasonable to me at a first-glance.

We are no longer blocked on #38 , so if you are interested in creating a PR with one or more of these added, we will be happy to look over and review it! And hopefully eventually we get all of these features added.

from solr-operator.

Spec.customSolrKubeOptions.podOptions and Spec.customSolrKubeOptions.statefulSetOptions have been added.

This allows for custom:

• Security Context
• Volumes
• Annotations on statefulSets/pods

What we still need:

• Service annotations
• Setting policy name on collections.

from solr-operator.

Service annotations have been added in Spec.customSolrKubeOptions.commonServiceOptions, Spec.customSolrKubeOptions.headlessServiceOptions and Spec.customSolrKubeOptions.nodeServiceOptions.

Last request is setting the policy name on a collection.

from solr-operator.

Since the SolrCollection CRD has been removed, this issue can be closed. All features on the SolrCloud CRD have been added.

from solr-operator.

@HoustonPutman I was looking for an option to set securityContext for solr-cloud containers but couldnt find any option in the SolrCloud CRD to do that. I only see option to set securityContext for sidecarContainers and initContainers.
Am I missing something?

from solr-operator.

You can set the podSecurityContext through customSolrKubeOptions.podOptions.podSecurityContext

from solr-operator.

@HoustonPutman Thanks for the reply, I wanted to drop all capabilities in security context which can be done using securityContext :

securityContext:
  capabilities:
    drop:
      - ALL
     

can you please tell me how can we achieve the same using customSolrKubeOptions.podOptions.podSecurityContext?
I couldnt find a way to mention the capabilities in podSecurityContext.

from solr-operator.

Ahh it looks like you can only set capabilities on the container security context. If you make a separate issue we can try to get that added.

from solr-operator.

thanks, created this issue #489

from solr-operator.