Feature Request: size-based rules about druid HOT 5 CLOSED

Sixtus, can you elaborate more on what "relative" means?

I think this should be relatively easy to add if we were to just make the rules hard and fast and force the operator to know that they aren't over-committing.

from druid.

by relative I meant relative to the configured size of the compute node

from druid.

The link to Pull Request #175 isn't actually legitimate. It was based on a misunderstanding of what this issue is asking for. Just saying.

from druid.

This issue has been marked as stale due to 280 days of inactivity.
It will be closed in 4 weeks if no further activity occurs. If this issue is still
relevant, please simply write any comment. Even if closed, you can still revive the
issue at any time or discuss it on the [email protected] list.
Thank you for your contributions.

from druid.

This issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that
is incorrect, or the issue requires additional review, you can revive the issue at
any time.

from druid.