Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (7)

yogeshdecodes avatar yogeshdecodes commented on August 15, 2024 6

@dlebech I wanted to reassure you that the project is not abandoned. In fact, we're using this library in many projects internally at Adori, which speaks to its value and utility within our workflows.

I'm relatively new to managing this project, but I'll be taking on the role of supporting its maintenance going forward. While our current priorities mean that we might not be focusing on introducing new features, we are committed to fixing bugs and ensuring the library remains compatible with the latest versions.

We genuinely appreciate your offer to help with the library's maintenance and any feedback you might have.

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

ofpiyush avatar ofpiyush commented on August 15, 2024 1

I don't have an active project using it and I don't work at the company anymore.

Would really appreciate help in maintaining and feedback from active users on PRs. 🙏

@niyeradori can someone at Adori pick it?

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

dlebech avatar dlebech commented on August 15, 2024 1

Thanks for you quick reply @ofpiyush 🙏

In terms of feedback, that's probably better for another thread, but I can tell you briefly that I'm using a fork with the only change being #8 cherry-picked, and that makes the library usable with the latest updates to fastapi/pydantic.

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

ofpiyush avatar ofpiyush commented on August 15, 2024 1

Yea we should get the changes merged in.

cc: @niyeradori

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

yogeshdecodes avatar yogeshdecodes commented on August 15, 2024

Hi @dlebech and @ofpiyush
Are the proposed changes in #8 backward compatible?
Additionally, do we need to upgrade the required FastAPI version to 0.100.0 to accommodate the Pydantic v2 changes proposed in #8?

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

dlebech avatar dlebech commented on August 15, 2024

@yogeshdecodes No, I don't think that #8 is backwards compatible and would be a breaking change for this library and should bump the major version... And yes, fastapi >=0.100.0 would then be required and should probably be specified in setup.py file (which it isn't right now).

But we're a bit off topic now 🙂 My question was more about whether anyone is going to take this package forward, or whether I should continue to use my own fork...

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

dlebech avatar dlebech commented on August 15, 2024

@yogeshdecodes that's good to hear! 🎉

from fastapi-cloud-tasks.

Related Issues (6)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.