Copying object with new storage class does not appear to save storage class about s3mock HOT 5 CLOSED

@a-farrukh I released 3.4.0 with support for StorageClass attributes. :)

from s3mock.

S3Mock is currently not persisting the StorageClass at all - we just return STANDARD for all requests.
I'll look into supporting StorageClass persistence.

from s3mock.

@afranken
Hey Arne,

Any ideas for a timeframe for when this can be implemented?

Thanks!

from s3mock.

@a-farrukh thanks for the reminder. I've been busy with other work but I started working on this now.
I'll have to ask you for a bit more patience, I hope to release a new version including a fix within the next two weeks or so.

I still have to look into the TODOs, and also other APIs to support - as I wrote in my last comment we do not support StorageClass persistence at all right now, we just return STANDARD in every response.

from s3mock.

@a-farrukh thanks for the reminder. I've been busy with other work but I started working on this now. I'll have to ask you for a bit more patience, I hope to release a new version including a fix within the next two weeks or so.

I still have to look into the TODOs, and also other APIs to support - as I wrote in my last comment we do not support StorageClass persistence at all right now, we just return STANDARD in every response.

Thanks for your response.

No problem! Do take as much time as you need to make sure it all works well and good :-)

from s3mock.