Question: Does ADL plan to build an LRS Validator like they did for SCORM? about adl_lrs HOT 7 CLOSED

It is definitely something we're looking into. We are planning on addressing this topic through the xAPI Google Groups and on the Spec call to gauge interest.

There is a statement validator in the LRS that @ljwolford developed. But we are also looking into providing a GitHub project space to allow the community, and ADL, to develop an 'official' LRS validator. We'd also look into supporting a fork of the LRS that could be enhanced to provide better feedback and more of a testing platform for people wanting to test their content.

I meant to respond to the LinkedIn question, but got sidetracked.

from adl_lrs.

Oh awsome, I'll make sure I am part of xAPI google groups, I just started this weekend to make an LRS validator for my GO_LRS project but made it open enough that others can use it, it is heavily based off of your LRS tests
https://github.com/MonkoftheFunk/LRS_Validator

from adl_lrs.

Oh on a different note, what is https://github.com/creighton/try_git are those requirements documents when you built the python LRS?

Oh please that would be great if you would respond to the linked in question, or I can quote you from your response above. :)

from adl_lrs.

Yeah @ljwolford pulled those out of the Experience API spec and organized them. I converted them to markdown. They could be used as a terse list of requirements and as a reference for testing software, much like the Conformance Requirements from SCORM. I just put them on try_git because it was easy to edit and check formatting online.

from adl_lrs.

Nice, very useful, where will they live for me to link to?

from adl_lrs.

not sure yet... if enough people find them useful they might move to the xapi spec project..

from adl_lrs.

gotcha, I'll keep an eye out on the adl group and the try git repo, thanks again for your time answering my questions, again great work!

from adl_lrs.