Review and update adiwg_dataQualityElement codelist about mdcodes HOT 6 CLOSED

@hmaier-fws DQ_CoverageResult was a new sub-class of DQ_Result, added by the 19157 2018 amendment. "Result of a data quality measure organizing the measured values as a coverage". If you look at the diagram on the ESIP web page you will see that ESIP's name is inconsistent with the ISO documentation. Likewise, the definition is inconsistent with the ISO document.

from mdcodes.

@dwalt @hmaier-fws Hilmar, you are correct, the coverage result is not DQ_ it's QE_ so I will get that changed

from mdcodes.

@dwalt @hmaier-fws I just realized, Hilmar, it looks like you're referring to the DQ_Element list, which I do not see anything about coverage result at all. The result class itself is QE_ but if it's supposed to be part of the DQ_Element Types then I don't see where it was added.

from mdcodes.

@hmaier-fws We have DQ_Confidence listed as 006, which appears to be the actual name used for Metaquality if I understand correctly:
<element name="DQ_Confidence" substitutionGroup="mdq:AbstractDQ_Metaquality" type="mdq:DQ_Confidence_Type">
Do we still need DQ_Metaquality?

And for DQ_ThematicAccuracy I found this one:
<element name="DQ_NonQuantitativeAttributeCorrectness" substitutionGroup="mdq:AbstractDQ_ThematicAccuracy" type="mdq:DQ_NonQuantitativeAttributeCorrectness_Type">
which we also have in our list.

from mdcodes.

@jwaspin @hmaier-fws Sorry for my earlier comment on DQ_Element, I confused it with evaluationMethod, I have deleted that comment.

Per earlier comment, CoverageResult is DQ_CoverageResult, according to the ISO 19157:2018 documentation. I don't know where ESIP got its information from.

DQ_Element parent classes are conceptual classes, therefore they were denormalized out. DQ_Metaquality is one such example. See adiwg/mdJson-schemas#224 for the definitive list.

from mdcodes.

Discussion issues resolved by about comments

from mdcodes.