"No right turn on red" relation is wrongly interpreted as a prohibited turn about brouter HOT 7 CLOSED

Ah, I removed the relation from the original example as that turn is one I frequently use for routing. Thanks for finding another example and sorry for the confusion.

from brouter.

Hi, looks like this was fixed in 1a2bb19 and was included in version 1.7.1? Should this issue be closed?

I happened upon this because this (former) limitation is mentioned in a couple of places on the OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No_turn_on_red
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:restriction%3Dno_right_turn_on_red
I'm happy to update those if the issue is indeed resolved.

from brouter.

Yes, this problem has been fixed. Thanks for the reminder!

PS: For some reason brouter.de is still running an older version of BRouter that does not yet include this fix.

from brouter.

Hi tensleepslav25,

ja the preprocessor just looks for "only_" and "no_" prefixes from the restriction tag.

There seem to be competing approaches on how to map "on_red" restrictions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No_turn_on_red

Sure I can filter out the "on_red" restrictions during pre-processing.

But there's no way to do it on the profile-level.

from brouter.

Thanks for the reply.

Filtering out "on_red" in pre-processing seems like the most sensible solution given the lack of consensus on tagging.

from brouter.

The example mentioned in post #1 does not work for some reason. Here is one that does:

• Route link
• Relation link

from brouter.

What really catched me off guard is that you "removed the restriction" by removing the via member. ;-)

from brouter.