Confusing behaviour of `scale` parameters about vpype HOT 4 CLOSED

Yes, scaleto would be the same as scale --to --keep-proportions, with an option to not keep proportions.

from vpype.

Thanks for the feedback, this is very useful. I see how this could be confusing.

On several occasions I did use the ability to do (relative) scale with units in factors, especially when using script or writing plugins. This allows me to use arbitrary units when generating geometries (for example a regular grid whose cells have unit width and height) and subsequently scale it to a predictable physical size (the unit-cell grid, when scaled with scale 1cm 1cm, would then have 1cm-sized cells, irrespective of the number of cell). This (admittedly advanced) use-case leads me to reject (1) and, thus, (2).

Having a separate scaleto command (for the lack of a better name) would definitely make sense, and would be easy to implement. I further think than it should default to the keep proportion behaviour since its the most common use-case, with an option to tight fit. Would that make sense to you? Any proposal for the command name?

from vpype.

Makes sense, I didn't think of this use case.
So as I understand the --to parameter would be dropped and scaleto would then be the same as what scale --to is now? I don't have any preference on the naming to be honest...

from vpype.

Further commit d2be51f to default to keeping proportions.

from vpype.