Service Contract for Discord about wmf-operating-model HOT 5 CLOSED

Krzysztof wrote first draft, Steve gave feedback, nearly there!

from wmf-operating-model.

• Is the discord server for both the Foundation and the wider community? If yes, I'd propose that:
  • Foundation roles get write access to foundation channels while others have read access.
  • Everyone has read and write access to community channels.
• How should we deal with permissions and roles ? More details are in #50
• The "Reporting/metrics" section has a couple of metrics and their downsides at gov.uk/government/publications/community-development-handbook/community-development-handbook#programme

If the above aren't relevant for the service contract, pls ignore :)

If they're relevant, we could add them at a later time in future iterations.

from wmf-operating-model.

Need to add metadata (YAML front matter) to mark this as draft as we're still working on it.

(Also thinking about folders.)

from wmf-operating-model.

Decided to use folders.

If all contracts are in one folder, you'd have to open each one to work out which is "accepted" and which is in "draft"

from wmf-operating-model.

Draft created.

from wmf-operating-model.