aggregate name: identity about rpivottable HOT 7 CLOSED

This is what List does :)

from rpivottable.

make sense, but the problem is that when selecting list unique values the height of cells is multiplied by ~5 which makes table not very read-able.

from rpivottable.

Yes, you end up listing the unique values in the total rows and cols, which sometimes distorts things. It's not clear what "identity" would do differently for the total cells.

from rpivottable.

@nicolaskruchten I don't think we could define "identity" for an aggregated measure, thus should be NA/empty

from rpivottable.

Sure, there are many ways to do this. If you want to add an aggregator here in the R binding you can do so by following the aggregator docs in the JS repo, but At this time I don’t want to add any more overlapping default aggregators at the JS layer. We have first/last/list already...

from rpivottable.

OK, so the "average" has to stay in my case.

from rpivottable.

I tend to use min or max or first or last myself. First/last work with strings, whereas average doesn’t.

from rpivottable.