2_survey's People
2_survey's Issues
Focus on particular transitions of interest; what are the main findings?
- wage -> self-employment
- wage -> wage (vs wage -> self or wage -> neet)
- apprentice/school -> work
- apprentice -> wage vs school -> wage
- apprentice -> self vs school -> self
- apprentice -> neet vs school -> neet
- school -> wage vs school -> self vs school -> neet
- apprentice -> wage vs apprentice -> self vs apprentice -> neet
- only a single occupation
- school -> work -> school
In intro note that nobody has done these high frequency surveys and why they are important
- Has nobody done high frequency surveys of youth? Double check
Table 13: life satisfaction and successful transition to work REGRESSION
- Do separately for men and women
- Control for age (NOT at baseline)
- Control for what activity people are doing, not the change in occupations
- start with model 4 and then add wage - Isa (we don't have good wage data -ed)
- add education - employment transition
Remove doi from references
Compare results to findings in literature (esp. for high-income countries) in conclusion
Make Table 9: Transition propensities into a chunk
Transition propensity tables "not totally clear" - Isa
Use different base rates: e.g. what is the propensity to transition to formal work conditional on being NEET in the previous period?
Do we need the p-values?
How did Cunningham and Salvagno present the data?
Sampling: how many districts were covered? How many ZDs out of how many total in regions covered?
Restructure introduction
Ask question before detailing method
a) what do we know
b) what question asked in this paper
c) what do we do in the paper
d) result
Table 6: Event history matrix changes
- - 87% self-employed transitions: stable/absorbing
- - RARELY do self-employed transition to wage employment
- - look at it by gender
- - take out absolute numbers
Figure out where to place paragraph linking education to employment
Table \ref{tab:eductable} in the Appendix details the educational attainment of youth in our survey by their activity at baseline. The similarity in upper education completion rates for employed and inactive youth are strongly suggestive of a queuing phenomenon, in which qualified youth endure long stints in unemployment while waiting for an offer from a limited pool of wage employers @serneels2007}. Moreover, educated youth are more likely to be inactive than to be self-employed: self-employed youth in our sample have completed primary education at half the rate of the NEET youth, and are 50% less likely to hold a baccalauréate or university diploma. In fact, a greater proportion of NEET youth holds a Bachelor's degree (License) than the employed, exemplary of the preponderance of the so-called "educated unemployed" observed throughout sub-Saharan Africa (see, for example, @matsumoto2010}).
Abstract: what is the least common path taken?
(in contrast to: "full-time work following a spell of inactivity is the most common path taken")
WHAT IS THE FOCUS
Isa suggestions:
- male vs female
- retrospective data vs panel data
- high- vs. low-income countries
Need a more recent benchmark than Quintini (2007)
Also look for comparable statistics in low income settings!
Isn't there an updated paper from Quintini from around 2017 that includes more countries?
Include education (% in uni, % with fees, tuition) and work formality stats in main descriptive table
Restructure lit review based on FINDINGS
And say what is missing (i.e. open questions, what we don't know)
Not clear why we need weighting if we stratified by size
- Reflect on this briefly and consider only reporting raw means if it makes more sense
- This will be questioned by committee - if decide to keep, have to at least have an explanation of what it's doing (even if it's not justified)
Clarify difference between first employment age, combined, etc
May be smart to cut losses on just use a single of the stats: maybe combined? And explain the thought process in detail in the Appendix?
Make a transition matrix with combine panel/history transitions and move the two separated matrices to Appendix B
Change references to rmarkdown style
Clarify "transition satisfaction" or choose another finding to put in abstract
"Finally, we find that youth who have transitioned to the labor market experience more life satisfaction, though no effect is detected for particular types of transitions."
What are common results (for school-to-work transition studies)?
What do we know about HICs?
Code pooled transition matrices in R
restructure body
Structure (provisional)
2.1 sampling
2.2 method of data collection
2.3 data
OPTION 1
3.1 how long from education to labour and what determines length of transition
3.2 aspirations and what determines aspirations (maybe can be included in transition paths)
3.3 neet and what determines neet
3.4 transition paths
3.5 job quality
3.6 life satisfaction
OPTION 2
3.1 how long from education to labour and what determines length of transition
3.2 neet, transition paths and aspirations
3.3 job quality and life satisfaction
OPTION 3
3.1 duration and neet and aspirations
3.2 transition paths
3.3 job quality
3.4 life satisfaction
Restructure abstract
- start with the question/gap/puzzle
- what do we do
- result
- what does it mean
Table 7: Activity matrix, panel data (pooled) comments
- Less stable than in yearly data, may indicate recall bias
- NEET stats: how many were ever NEET, and how many went "back and forth with unemployment"?
- Perhaps this could mean the percentage that was wage (or self) then NEET then wage (or self) again?
- Include NEET results in this section
More ideas:
- Average age of NEET for pooled sample
- Average % NEET by age for pooled sample
Be explicit about available literature on longitudinal school-to-work transition studies in LICs
How many & for which countries?
Double check stats in conclusion
"Only about a quarter of youth is observed to have transitioned to the labor market, despite a mean respondent age of over 24 years."
vs.
"we find that youth in Cotonou graduate at the age of 22 years, four months, and find their first employment opportunity about about 5 months later, on average, but find attachment to the labor market only after about two years on the job search."
Explain why non-apprentices were chosen
Does Manacorda et al. include data on rural youth?
I think so, double check
also:
HOW DONE, WHICH COUNTRIES, WHICH YEARS?
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.